000 04572cam a22004095i 4500
001 21539426
005 20210611112105.0
008 990211s2019 tu b 000 0 eng c
010 _a 2019446718
020 _a9789758573912
020 _a9758573918
035 _a(OCoLC)on1112702454
037 _c30.00 USD
040 _aINU
042 _apcc
043 _aa-tu---
099 _aH2p
_bKORKU 32413
100 1 _aKorkusuz, Mehmet Hişyar,
245 1 0 _aRevisiting Lausanne after 100 years in the context of the National Pact goal /
_cPh.D Mehmet Hişyar Korkusuz.
264 1 _aMalatya :
_bİnönü University Press,
300 _aii, 97 pages :
_bmap ;
_c21 cm.
336 _atext
337 _aunmediated
338 _avolume
490 0 _aİnönü University Press ;
520 _aRevisting Lausanne After 100 Yeras in the Context the National Pact Goal Kitap Açıklaması There are many lessons to be learnt from history, with devastating wars and disasters in particular paving the way for changes and developments that are both challenging and painful, in all regards. Among the geostrategic adjustments of the last century, the arrangements regarding the reorganization of geographical and political units after the collapse of the Ottoman State, particularly in Turkey, the Balkans and the Middle East, were made with the Treaty of Lausanne. Although Turkey came to the table as an equal sovereign state, holding its head high, to secure its existence and resolve its survival problem, once and for all, with a national spirit of unity and solidarity, it was forced into engage in a challenging diplomatic struggle with multifaceted conflicts of interest under the influence of the dominant states and new powers in international policy. The focus of the speech delivered by İsmet Pasha in the press conference during the Lausanne Conference can be summarized with two words: National Pact, and there is no wrong in looking at the Treaty of Lausanne within the context of the National Pact. Also, from the perspective of internal political tensions and conflicts, the Treaty of Lausanne caused a domino effect in the transition from the 'ancient regime' to the 'new order' (new political regime). What the Turkish party wanted to do was to give the message that it had undergone a radical change. The strategy for the security of the energy basin, particularly the oil reserves, in the Middle East, which was the most important issue for the West, had already been put into practice following the fall and partitioning of the Ottoman State, and so it would be more rational to monitor Turkey in its current form, which had made the world recognize its existence with war and the National Struggle, and taken a stance of ideological change. Lausanne could be considered an international political crisis management and solution-seeking process in which particular focus on the new leadership structure that arose out of extraordinary conditions and processes, and its capability and capacity for diplomatic maneuverability became prominent. In the end, the Republic of Turkey rose like a phoenix from the ashes of the Ottoman State. Turkey has now evolved into a different country, based on its willingness to reach the contemporary level of civilization over the last 100 years and its democratization efforts over the second half of the last century. The consideration and improvement of the incessantly controversial Treaty of Lausanne in the light of a permanent national security and policy document that will not change periodically as leaders, ideologies and governments step in, requires and even entails the adoption of a common future vision, along with strategic thinking. Hence, fixed and variable elements shall be addressed as a whole, and this holistic and flexible attitude shall be brought together with deeper levels of the social stratification and international psycology and sociology.
541 _aIdefix
630 0 0 _aTreaty of Lausanne
650 0 _aWorld War, 1914-1918
651 0 _aTurkey
_xForeign relations
651 0 _aEurope
_xForeign relations
651 0 _aTurkey
_yRevolution, 1918-1923
651 0 _aTurkey
_y20th century.
906 _a0
942 _2lcc
999 _c227052