TY - BOOK AU - Danforth,Nicholas L. TI - The remaking of republican Turkey: memory and modernity since the fall of the Ottoman Empire SN - 9781108833240 AV - DR590 .D327 2021 U1 - 320.4956109/04 23 PY - 2021///] CY - Cambridge, United Kingdom, New York PB - Cambridge University Press KW - Politics and culture KW - Turkey KW - HISTORY / Middle East / General KW - bisacsh KW - Politics and government KW - 1918-1960 KW - Foreign relations KW - 1980- KW - Memory N1 - Includes bibliographical references and index; A nation votes : democratic modernity for the masses -- Turkey attends the American classroom : modernization as U.S. policy and propaganda -- Europe in Asia and Asia in Europe : synthetic identities and the promise of paradox -- Multi-purpose empire : reinventing Ottoman history in Republican Turkey -- Istanbul yesterday and today : making the past modern -- Ottomans, Arabs, and Americans : geography and identity in Turkish diplomacy -- The path to progress and to God : Islamic modernism for the Cold War N2 - "Turkey held its first democratic elections in 1950 and joined NATO in 1952. These dramatic domestic and international developments facilitated an equally dramatic reinterpretation of the country's imagined past and its anticipated future. Under the influence of electoral politics and Cold War competition, Turkish politicians, intellectuals, and voters articulated a distinct vision of mid-century modernity, at once aspirationally liberal, proudly nationalistic, rationally pious and appropriately prosperous. They optimistically asserted, with the enthusiastic agreement of many foreign observers, that Turkey was on the verge of transcending its notorious clichés by finally reconciling religion and secularism, tradition and modernity, and, of course, East and West. In exploring Turkey's transformation between 1945 and 1960, I argue that present-day thinkers intent on transcending these same purported binaries have misunderstood what was so unique about mid-century politics. Moreover, recognizing the ease with which authors in this era reworked narratives about history and modernity in order to advance their rival agendas reveals the profound malleability of such narratives - and should make modern scholars more aware of how we politicize similar narratives in our own work today"-- ER -